WEBVTT

00:00:00.250 --> 00:00:04.610
Fabric Intelligence is custom OmniNodes, powered by Meta models.

00:00:04.871 --> 00:00:08.244
They do deciding, shimming, and search and retrieval.

00:00:08.505 --> 00:00:12.530
Here's what runs today, what we've measured, and what we're still trying.

00:00:12.560 --> 00:00:15.549
One decider runs on our Eranos workers.

00:00:15.579 --> 00:00:20.380
An hourly job reads recorded results, and sets the mix of models and personas.

00:00:20.733 --> 00:00:23.525
Its choices are Muse Spark and Muse Wonder.

00:00:23.555 --> 00:00:28.160
We set a goal and a reward, and it changes its own mix from what it measures.

00:00:28.190 --> 00:00:29.785
We also fine-tune.

00:00:29.815 --> 00:00:33.061
Muse Glimmer thirty B is Meta's open model.

00:00:33.252 --> 00:00:36.648
We train a small add-on for it, called an adapter.

00:00:37.002 --> 00:00:40.932
No answers from the Meta API went into its training data.

00:00:41.124 --> 00:00:43.265
One adapter learns four jobs:

00:00:43.295 --> 00:00:48.340
splitting requests, reviewing work, search and retrieval, and tool calls.

00:00:48.370 --> 00:00:50.977
Here are the results on held-out tests.

00:00:51.331 --> 00:00:56.515
For splitting requests, the score rose from forty-five percent to about ninety-eight.

00:00:56.869 --> 00:01:01.495
For review, it accepted one flawed report out of one hundred twenty-six.

00:01:01.687 --> 00:01:06.750
These tests were also used to choose the final version, so they aren't a fresh test.

00:01:06.780 --> 00:01:10.617
For search and retrieval, it picks one Task Object from a list.

00:01:10.878 --> 00:01:15.703
When a match exists, its top pick was right about eighty-nine percent of the time.

00:01:15.963 --> 00:01:19.718
Untuned, counted generously, the model got eighty-eight.

00:01:19.748 --> 00:01:22.134
So tuning mainly fixed its format.

00:01:22.325 --> 00:01:26.610
We also taught it to say that nothing fits, and that cost some recall.

00:01:26.640 --> 00:01:30.338
We also tested whether fine-tuning could replace a shim.

00:01:30.785 --> 00:01:33.425
In an earlier test of one hundred twenty cases,

00:01:33.455 --> 00:01:38.326
a separate adapter alone, with no added notes, scored sixty-two percent.

00:01:38.459 --> 00:01:43.399
The untuned model with a shim of two hundred twenty-two tokens scored twenty-nine.

00:01:43.962 --> 00:01:46.707
Most of that gain came from splitting requests.

00:01:46.737 --> 00:01:49.760
On recall alone, the difference could be chance.

00:01:49.790 --> 00:01:52.850
Our newest model decides how to handle each request:

00:01:53.041 --> 00:01:58.573
with code, with a model, with both, by reuse, or not at all, and whether to split it.

00:01:58.834 --> 00:01:59.791
It's trained.

00:01:59.821 --> 00:02:04.040
But its test on real work isn't scored yet, so we show no number.

00:02:04.070 --> 00:02:08.127
These fine-tuned models don't carry routine live work today.

00:02:08.157 --> 00:02:09.556
Our rule is simple.

00:02:09.689 --> 00:02:13.573
A fine-tuned model must beat the default on held-out tests.

00:02:13.706 --> 00:02:16.325
It starts on a small share of live work.

00:02:16.400 --> 00:02:18.716
And it switches back if results drop.

00:02:19.279 --> 00:02:22.680
A checker never shares a fine-tune with the maker it checks.

00:02:22.710 --> 00:02:25.665
The newest idea is editing weights directly.

00:02:25.856 --> 00:02:29.566
Researchers at MIT call it Weight-Space Programming.

00:02:29.757 --> 00:02:33.744
A capable model reads a network's weights, runs a few test passes,

00:02:33.774 --> 00:02:36.056
and edits them, with no training loop.

00:02:36.247 --> 00:02:39.875
We're setting up a test based on their method, on Muse Glimmer,

00:02:39.905 --> 00:02:42.662
with test problems the editor will never see.

00:02:42.854 --> 00:02:44.333
We have no result yet.

00:02:44.363 --> 00:02:46.726
No edited weights run in production.

00:02:47.080 --> 00:02:49.330
Whatever we find, we'll show it.

00:02:49.360 --> 00:02:52.105
Our live policies learn from recorded results.

00:02:52.135 --> 00:02:54.742
Our fine-tuned models are still in testing.

00:02:54.933 --> 00:02:58.155
Connect your agents at teleionlabs.com.

